Thilo Sarrazin, mastermind of the New Right
Sarrazin links the birth rate, religion (Islam) and intelligence with one another and in his latest book “Hostile Takeover” laments in a racist manner a devaluation of Western values and a general decline in intelligence due to the advance of Islam. The Calvinist values, renunciation, thrift, effort and diligence would lose their importance, Islam would devalue them. A high birth rate (“net production rate”) of Muslims with below-average educational performance would “lead to a noticeable decline in cognitive abilities in Europe” in our western society. “Our national character is changing, social costs are rising and economic returns are decreasing.”
Alternatively, however, it would be open to everyone to move up to the middle class and claim all the privileges of the middle class. A population explosion, however, would have meant that traditional forms of economy and life would not be able to feed the masses of Muslim countries. Here he approaches the blood-and-soil theory of the Nazis, even if he avoids directly eugenic arguments.
However, he formulates the fears of the bourgeoisie, who have reached their social position through effort, self-discipline and renunciation, fears decline, and believes that “rampant children” would represent an inadequate reward for the Muslim masses, which one had to renounce.
He demoted his readers to students, without even having a knowledge advantage or a superior point of view and hides his Calvinist, petty-bourgeois world view behind a swarm of tables and numbers.
According to him, the division of the Arab world into nation states and various western areas of influence by the colonial powers is the height of wisdom. And instead of learning from the colonial rulers, the Arabs have increased the birth rate and therefore the Palestinians are also to blame for their own fate; the genocide of the Palestinians is denied, instead Sarrazin speaks of an inappropriately high birth rate. The world community must pay the living of the refugees, but they should prove to be adults, be grateful to the Israelis, accept their situation and emigrate from Palestine!
In comparing the scriptures, he forgets that in today's US, a relevant portion of the population believes in the creation of the earth in seven days and is the vice-president. Witch burnings and crusades do not seem worth mentioning; and if the colonized peoples had accepted the Western way of life and Christianity, they would feel better now. He is generously ignoring the plundering of the mineral resources of these countries.
He claims: "The expansion of the Arabs and Islam was a military campaign that overthrew and overthrew superior civilizations." So now the birthless, peaceful Europe from Gibraltar to Central Asia is surrounded by the Islamic world and: "Conservative forces among Muslims with expansive conquering power through demographic overwhelming are relying on takeover of Western society." Sarrazin regrets that in a democracy there would be no way to prevent Islamic majorities emerging in Europe from changing laws and rules of life in an Islamic sense. He quotes: "The stronger as such is far from being the better, and in history the defeat of the noble is a great danger." Sarrazin calls for a radical break in this trend: "We have a duty to counter this threat."
Sarrazin, the Rosenberg of our time.
And history is repeated:
Alfred Rosenberg, the National Socialist chief ideologist, wanted to save the West from a Jewish conspiracy by Germanizing the East with an increase in the birth rate of a Western master race.
Alfred Rosenberg caused irreparable damage with his cultural raids in Europe.
Today, Sarrazin is a cultural-historical banter and prepared by his denial of the cultural achievements of Islam, the ideological ground for cultural barbarism: Already Berlusconi began according to the neo-liberal ideas with the tampering of cultural property from state property to wealthy individuals. Neoliberalism and New Rights meet here. The two relatives get along well.
I will buy the book "Hostile Takeover".
Regardless of the fact that I have not yet read this book, I have noticed that TS is fundamentally overdrawn in its theses - in some cases dangerously - in order to be even noticed.
Some of the established parties and some in the public media want to hide this topic in principle.
What this has led so far, we have seen in the last state elections. Former strong people's parties are shrinking to minorities and rights have become stronger than ever. Again and again it is ignored that the Merkel migration policy has failed. It was her from the beginning!
Integration is not a debt of the Germans; it has to be wanted by the migrants and they have to be able to integrate. However, this is generally not the case among migrants from the Levant or from North Africa.
All critics of CDU / SPD politics have been put in the right corner. Of the Greens and the Left does not want to write here at all. Since they were not responsible, they would most like to set up a free taxi service to D. Sounds uneducated; but in the core.
And our media - especially people like Claus K. with his Gundula G. from the ZDF “Heute Journal” have constantly ironed out any critics with their comments. Is that what freedom of expression looks like?
In this respect, it is not surprising that there are people like TS who dare to represent other opinions.
We need people in Germany who are not obedient or partisan.
We do not need any of these do-gooders who believe that only they, with their ultimate personal opinion, can save the entire world.
That is why we do not need the UN migration pact, because it ultimately places immigration countries like DEU under moral constraint, while maintaining state sovereignty.
On the other hand, due to a lack of commitment, the pact does not continue to force the countries of origin of the migrants to take back their own compatriots!
How can you force the dictatorial regimes to take back their compatriots if you are trading with them at the same time, a trade that protects the wealth of the West and its lead? The “elites” of these countries, who are corrupt by our standards, exercise force and violence on behalf of the first world countries and the insane exploitation of natural resources can take place undisturbed. Our economic and social system is based on this.
"How do you want to force the dictatorial regimes to take back their compatriots ..."
That's the point! That is why the UN Migration Pact is also feeble-minded. The corrupt countries of origin of the migrants all sign the pact. Is also without risk!
However, the countries affected by the migration should think about whether or not they agree to the current situation by agreeing to this pact.
In any case, I see no solution.
And let's not fool ourselves; the causes of migration are not (only) the exploitation of the industrialized nations. Many African states have been self-governing for more than half a century. Construction helpers of the west sand. Provision is not known. You just live in the day. The mentality is just different than ours.
The problem is also an ethnic problem. The different ethnic groups are incompatible. And not just since independence. They did not tolerate each other even centuries before.
Therein lies the cause of corruption and the formation of corrupt elites in these countries. These are regularly bound to defined ethnic groups!