Niels Högel and the self-righteous index finger

But this should only apply to the lone perpetrator. If the political class carries out a radical killing program on its subordinates, then one should not become suspicious. Then the journalistic arm of the class places itself protectively in front of it and finds all kinds of justifications: “deadly epidemic, the dying of the elderly, the overburdened interestnsive care units,” and so on.

Annette Ramelsberger: (South German 18.02.22)

"Seasoned senior physicians would rather play dumb than admit a shred of responsibility. Of course, nobody trusts their own colleagues to serially murder patients. After all, you are in the hospital, not in a detective story. But doesn't one have to prick up your ears when there are rumors among colleagues about the "Reaper" Högel, when the consumption of a heart medication increases by 700 percent, when the death rate on the ward skyrockets? Where does doing nothing turn into intent? Because you don't have to want the murders to be guilty. It is enough to accept them: in order not to risk trouble or damage the reputation of the clinic. Anyone who makes this the yardstick for their actions is putting the lives of patients at risk. It is called conditional intent and it is punishable.

It's not just the clinic staff who have hardly taken on any responsibility to this day. The prosecutors who dragged the proceedings and left it to the victims' relatives to fight for clarification have not been charged."

Yes, you have to be careful!

But that should only apply to the individual perpetrator. When the political class carries out a radical program of killing its subordinates, one should not become suspicious. Then the journalistic arm of the class protects it and finds all sorts of justifications: "deadly epidemic, the dying of the elderly, the overburdened intensive care units" etc.

They cold-bloodedly conceal the many fatalities caused by the injections, the emptying of old people's homes, the permanent closure of hospitals, the millions of severely disabled people, the death streak among athletes and the children who were injected to death.

And so that it doesn't become too conspicuous, they get upset about a single perpetrator, they just don't want it to become obvious how neglected the care of the elderly and sick is. A corrupt bank manager is singled out, but the corrupt system (Cum-Ex) is not to be touched. Occasionally the flow of money to a politician comes to light, but this is then reported as an exception.

And the millions that B. Gates paid to the "Spiegel" and the "Süddeutsche" are carefully concealed. Whoever has enough money is then called a philanthropist or he is a good functionary like the chancellor, then corruption is generously swept under the rug.

And the press thinks it can morally exaggerate itself by accusing one mass murder and justifying the much bigger one. They label all sorts of people as anti-Semites, give unctuous speeches on memorial days, and think this is a way to hide their own racism.

They condemn fascism in other countries in order to be able to enforce it in their own country with less disruption.