The terror and the new world order
The terrorist attacks in Paris, London and Berlin were carried out by Arabs. Their peoples are constrained by two fascist states. From the north, the terror of the apartheid regime of Israel robs the Palestinians of the air they breathe, and in the south, Saudi Arabia is armed IS gangs and mercenary armies. Both "stabilize" the region on behalf of the West. Lying in the middle, the Egyptian military junta, funded with American billions, is suppressing any aspirations for freedom. The fall and execution of S. Hussein and Gaddafi serve as a warning to all insubordinate dictators. The strength of the West was no longer sufficient to overthrow Assad as well. Here the roll back of the West was stopped by Russia and the Iranian regional power.
Russia does not want to recognize a unipolar world order dominated by the US, and the US can no longer enforce it; at the same time, China and Germany are pushing for the world stage. Apparently, capitalism now requires a multipolar order. The peoples who do not benefit, feel their helplessness and resist with the retarding cultural elements such as art, religion and national consciousness.
The capitalist world order with the pursuit of returns as the supreme law create the material basis for cultural achievements on the one hand, but are diametrically opposed to them on the other. Peoples crushed in these trials give birth to terrorists who would rather blow themselves up than be suffering spectators.
More and more Nigerians are realizing that the wealth of the West is based on the exploitation of their oil resources, South Africans are increasingly recognizing the importance of extracting gold from their mines, and the Congolese are beginning to sense the West's dependency on the rare earths and copper mined there.
The unrestrained exploitation of mineral resources and labor of the poor countries requires increasing military efforts, which one superpower can no longer create on its own. However, the resulting multipolarity does not jeopardize the existing economy and our social model; on the contrary, it benefits the attachment.