Is a new Wagenknecht party unnecessary?

What is expected of a Wagenknecht party?

  • That it unites the resistance against the party cartel. That she does not see the AfD as an opponent, but as a complement and deals with it accordingly.
  • That she condemns the influx of workers from Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe and advocates for a minimum wage of twenty euros.
  • That she advocates a withdrawal of all German troops from Africa and Asia. That she calls for a ban on arms deliveries to all countries and an exit from NATO.
  • That she advocates a friendly relationship with Russia. That she demands the repair of the gas pipeline through the Baltic Sea and the unhindered supply of Russian gas.
  • That she demands an immediate end to the injection regime and the punishment of all those responsible (15 years for Merkel, Scholz and Lauterbach with subsequent preventive detention). All vaccination victims should receive immediate help. The authorities must be instructed to collect and publish correct figures.
  • The lifting of all economic restrictions and the provision of energy for basic needs and market economy mechanisms should be called for.
  • State television should be dissolved and broadcast to regional and municipal institutions. All subsidies should be stopped.
  • The abolition of the Federal Constitutional Court and the Ethics Council should be demanded.
  • The abolition of the secret services such as the so-called Office for the Protection of the Constitution should be put on the agenda.

But if the new party is as “left-wing” as Ramelow, who has recalcitrant judges sentenced to prison, people would be happy to do without this new party.

Norbert Haring

7 Replies to “Is a new Wagenknecht party unnecessary?”

  1. https://www.manova.news/artikel/gegnerische-verbundete

    “Yes, we need resistance against the power octopus made up of financial, IT and pharmaceutical companies, against the military-industrial complex and its accomplices in politics and the media. It would be too risky to leave the field to the global governance claim of a unipolar world order according to the US's taste. To prevent the worst, we have to be many and pull together. But who exactly are “we”? Leftists often shy away from patriots and more economically liberal-minded people who are worried that the government in Germany will flatten the location. Conversely, there is also considerable fear of contact. Is project-related cooperation class treason? Is the cross-front accusation justified in such cases? Or is it simply strategic sense when different camps that don't always agree with each other take the field together against a currently more dangerous and powerful enemy - of which there are successful examples in history? In an article, Susan Bonath warned of “neoliberal submarines” that spread freedom rhetoric into elite-critical discourses, but in reality were rather harmful to a social agenda. Diether Dehm, former Bundestag member of the Left and artist, contradicts her in this article as a Marxist. In the interest of a more effective unity of action, he calls for overcoming boundaries of thought and milieu and a new opening to homeland, but also to market-oriented traffic light critics.”

  2. https://tkp.at/2023/09/12/gruendung-der-wagenknecht-partei-offenbar-fix/

    “The AfD was originally a neoliberal party founded in West Germany. In recent years, however, the “social-patriotic” regional associations in the East have become increasingly important. If the AfD deepens this line and gives the social issue great weight, it will lose little to Wagenknecht. If, on the other hand, she reacts by denouncing Wagenknecht as a “GDR communist” and switches back to neoliberal positions, more people, especially in the eastern federal states, will migrate from the AfD to Wagenknecht.”

  3. “High quality ONS data on the English population

    The data already takes into account the different proportions of the population per 100.000 according to vaccination status. The data is also age-stratified and age-standardized. The advantages at a glance:

    Data for the entire English population including all deaths

    Finely divided according to vaccination status of 0-4 vaccination doses

    Vaccination status adjusted for population per 100.000

    Age-stratified finely divided across all age groups from 18-90+ years

    Age standardized

    Exact calculation based on person-years

    The result is devastating for the Covid vaccination. There are no advantages for vaccinated people in the overall risk-benefit balance. On the contrary: the results indicate a massive impact of the side effects at the expense of the overall risk-benefit balance. If the Covid mRNA vaccination has a positive effect, the side effects seem to exceed this.

    The deaths involve all causes of death and not just Covid deaths. However, Covid deaths only make up a small proportion of the total deaths. These results all the more indicate high side effects resulting in death from the Covid vaccination. These obviously have an impact on the overall death record of the English population.

    Overall mortality (all cause mortality) is one of the most meaningful parameters. Here, manipulative or euphemistic interventions in the evaluation can be largely ruled out.”

  4. https://sciencefiles.org/2023/09/13/luegenpresse-trifft-junk-science-menschengemachtes-waldsterben-wird-dem-klimawandel-angelastet/

    “The editorial team of the ARD Tagesschau has been spinning its wheels for weeks.
    Every day there is an attempt to spread the narrative of man-made climate change and to instill fear in those still within reach of public broadcasters.

    It's crazy:

    If a young man develops cardiac arrhythmias, becomes short of breath or collapses and dies of myocarditis four days after being injected into his upper arm with the healing juice “Comirnaty” from the major philanthropic company Pfizer and the new billionaire Sahin, the connection between Comirnaty and death applies of the young man as “just a correlation” that Comirnaty was the lethal agent has not been proven.

    Meanwhile, when a supposed scientist claims that 4% CO2 of human origin in the planet's atmosphere has more influence than the 96% remaining CO2 of natural origin, the sun and all other forms of galactic climate influences combined, so that the 4% of the so important for plants CO2, which comes from human production, heats up the planet so much that the seas tip over, it becomes colder and warmer, windier and calmer, drier and rainier at the same time and the trees in the Black Forest are dying, then there are a lot of busybodies who are trying "To find an intelligent facial expression and nod your head at this very obvious causality."

  5. “Removing” teachers from schools and universities who do not behave in a manner consistent with wokeness is reminiscent of dark phases in German history. These “purges” have occurred in all historical eras; they have never been anything other than state terror, no matter what guise they came in, whether disguised as pious, politically correct, anti-racist or anti-fascist. The inner logic of woke state terror becomes clear when you understand why wokeness is instrumentalized: On the one hand, it serves capital interests, and on the other hand, it is intended to constrain society to an absolutely conformist way of thinking. This makes it a fascist domestic instrument of struggle and discipline.

    A company that advocates for women's, gay and lesbian rights, for people of color, diverse people, etc. can't be reactionary - can it? Conversely, it becomes a shoe: Capitalism has understood how to include minorities in its exploitation interests. Things used to be different, when racial discrimination and apartheid were an integral part of the neocolonial capitalist project. These times are over, capitalism had to adapt to the new social conditions and large corporations in conjunction with the state are now the pioneers of the new “wokeness movement”. The fact is that almost all corporations are participating in the prescribed authoritarian cultural change under the banner of a “Human Rights Campaign”. In other words: Wokeness serves large corporations and governments to position themselves as global human rights saviors. Their transhumanist agenda shows that they are the opposite. The aim of the political caste is clear: it wants to distract from the gigantic problems that it constantly creates. To this end, it demands maximum internal conformity while at the same time producing uncertainty and confusion.

    Wokeness reaches the dangerously slippery slope of state terror at the latest when it promotes a culture war, which is also enforced with brutal means. The aforementioned “cleansing” at universities, including the destruction of the existence of professors or lecturers who do not conform to wokeness, speaks volumes here. Many have already fallen under the wheels of modern state terror. Wokeness is above all a propaganda program (once again coming from the USA) to capture and employ primarily left-wing milieus, absorb their energies and steer them away from the fundamental questions of power. The formerly critical spirit of the left fell completely by the wayside on the way to the wokeness movement, and actually only continued the total intellectual collapse in connection with coming to terms with the events of 9/11. Already back then, after 2001, it ignored the total changes in the domestic political situation in the USA towards dictatorship and the “war on terror” as a result of 9/11.

    As a result, wokeness became a fascist aid ideology to save ailing capitalism and its ruling fraternities. The left-wing parties in Europe have also become free riders of the capitalist wokeness ideology, which will cost them dearly. On its wrong path of wokeness, the “left” has completely abandoned its preoccupation with political-economic connections, questions of dominance and power, and has thus made it superfluous.”

    Ullrich Mies: The new fascism that no one wants to be

  6. https://tkp.at/2023/10/31/das-buendnis-sahra-wagenknecht-ist-eine-katastrophe-fuer-deutschland/

    “If the public expected a rejuvenation of politics, they were soon disappointed. The only thing that was rejuvenated was the political left - a rejuvenation that amounted to lip service to a slightly less woke, less bellicose and less authoritarian version of the left and the Greens. “In fact, the BSW board has the charm of a social democratic morning pint run by middle-aged women and men who meet on Sundays for prosecco and Fassbinder films in an EU-funded ArtHouse cinema.”

  7. https://apolut.net/migrationspakt-wenn-armutsmigration-in-fachkraefteeinwanderung-umbenannt-wird-von-norbert-haering/

    “When a government opens the borders wide to supposedly foreign skilled workers (with low incomes) and their extended families, but at the same time does nothing to solve the worsening housing shortage and counteract the steep rise in rents: is this still normal lobbying policy or is it open contempt those outside the red-green-yellow feel-good and prosperity bubble?”

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked