What now, Mr. Maaßen?

The AfD was originally a party of notables, but then credibly turned to the lower classes. Are you not happy with this development because you consider yourself to be better and place more emphasis on the upper class? The clique at the founding leaves this question open. If you want to address the problems raised in the interests of the upper class, then we don't actually need your new party

You want to form a coalition with the CDU, whose leader wants to invade Russia. And are you supporting warmongering against Russia or do you think you could change this party's mind again? So far, no one in the party has spoken out against this war policy of its chairman, on the contrary, little barkers like Kiesewetter have agreed. If you also agree, then we don't need your new party.

 And how do you plan to repair the damage caused by the traffic lights? Many billions have been spent and who will pay for it now? Lots of “special assets” for the Bundeswehr, for Ukraine, for the energy transition. How many billions there actually are is carefully kept secret. In any case it has to be paid for. Should pensioners now bear these costs with only a small increase in their salaries? The fishermen alone, who have now been charged, cannot raise these amounts. Even the tax increases for farmers do not raise enough billions of euros.

  • Should hauliers continue to pay their truck drivers €5 an hour? should farmers be reduced to the income level of Ukrainians or Romanians? Should the pawn laying continue?
  • Which medium-sized industry should be liquidated next? As you know, the agricultural lands of western Ukraine have been bought up by American corporations. Should life be made so difficult for German innkeepers that the industry is completely dominated by US industry?
  • Are you in favor of opening the Baltic Sea pipeline or do you prefer fracking gas from the USA?
  • Are you in favor of punishing Corona crimes? Should the death from injections continue in secret, without anyone raising their voice? Should the millions of sick people receive no compensation?
  •  If you want to end the climate conspiracy and roll back the laws, then say so openly.  
  • You have now separated from your friends who represent extremist positions, but do you have a concept or an idea who should now bear the burden of the many billions? Or should inflation quietly and secretly reduce the debt burden? 
  • And you probably see the fascisation already in full swing. Are you in favor of the Public Prosecutor General remaining a political position and part of the Prime Minister's disposal?
  •  Are you in favor of keeping gender polarity abolished or are you ready to roll back the laws.
  • That you are for family and prosperity, you can save yourself these slogans. Be specific and take a stand on people's important problems.

3 Replies to “What now Mr. Maaßen?”

  1. Take a stand on these problems that are troubling people, Mr. Maaßen. You may have a fortnight before the mainstream pushes you into a corner. Even Sahra Wagenknecht, who has more experience with journalists, has to accept a one-sided choice of topics.

  2. https://apolut.net/gefaehrliche-nullen-nancy-faeser-von-uwe-froschauer/

    “Stupidity is a more dangerous enemy of good than malice. Evil can be protested against, it can be exposed, it can be prevented with violence if necessary, evil always carries the germ of self-destruction within itself by leaving at least one feeling of discomfort in people. We are defenseless against stupidity. Neither protests nor violence can achieve anything here; Reasons don't get caught; Facts that contradict one's own prejudice simply need not be believed - in such cases the stupid person even becomes critical - and if they are unavoidable, they can simply be brushed aside as meaningless isolated cases. In contrast to the evil person, the stupid person is completely satisfied with himself; yes, he even becomes dangerous by attacking when easily irritated. Therefore, more caution should be exercised towards the stupid than towards the evil one.”

  3. https://tkp.at/2024/03/01/britische-truppen-in-ukraine-scholz-empoert-london/

    The debate over the Taurus missiles has sparked a diplomatic crisis between Germany and Great Britain. Chancellor Scholz is accused of “misusing intelligence information”.

    “In London people are outraged by Scholz, who is “completely irresponsible”. He had claimed that British troops were supporting Ukraine in firing rockets at Russian forces. He is accused of “blatant misuse of intelligence information”. Scholz is probably partly responsible for the fact that it became known on Tuesday that a “small number” of British troops were operating in Ukraine.

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked