The kippah is a religious symbol, not a racial one
The headgear is worn during religious activities. Anyone who wants to respect religion may wear it, whether black or white, whether yellow or red. The bishop's hat, the cross or the rosary also make religious references, but not racial ones.
The pope and other religious dignitaries endure constant abuse and handle it with aplomb. Artistic representations of religious dignitaries, even if clearly derogatory, fell under artistic freedom in the pre-Corona era. As a rule, they showed the discrepancy between the moral claim and reality. This representation of moral feeling is the origin of all art.
Is it any wonder that the propagandists of the authoritarian Corona regime are now spreading themselves and accusing the documenta of anti-Semitism. They can well distract from their own racism and from the fact that the genetic manipulations through the billions of "vaccinations" represent the greatest racist attack on humanity.
Of course, Steinmeier and C. Roth are at the forefront. The credibility of these figures, however, tends towards zero. Unfortunately, sensitive art viewers like Kia Vahland get under the wheels. This mass psychosis has a totalitarian character. But that was no different under National Socialism. At that time people spoke of "degenerate art", now they say: "Artistic freedom has its limits here".
The headgear is worn during religious acts. Anyone who wants to respect religion may wear it, whether black or white, yellow or red. The bishop's hat, the cross or the rosary also make religious references, but not racial ones...
Here the German Michel speaks from the mouth of C. Roth: (27.07.22/XNUMX/XNUMX)
Everyone sees the anti-Semitic intention in the pictures. How can you depict a military commander with a pig face! Everyone here knows that artists are pursuing anti-Semitic intentions. The fact that the people in the pictures are rebelling and are being asked to unite is essentially anti-Semitism. Artists from Indonesia who receive money from us need to know that.
And they have to take this into account when exhibiting in Germany. And that they also use SS runes to remind us Germans of our past, we cannot accept this insult.
We Western countries pay well for the raw materials that we have dug out of the ground in the countries of the South. We cannot allow criticism of this on German soil.
In general, the climate catastrophe should be the subject of artists from all over the world. And there should also be artists from Israel, so that everyone can see that we are no longer racists. The music by R. Wagner at the Bayreuth Festival is a good example of how Germans can enjoy art without anti-Semitism.
Therefore it is good if a team of censors is put together to stamp out all degenerate works of art. A first step was the dismissal of the general director.
An Israeli, possibly a Jew, is obviously shown with a pig's face (the detour via "Mossad" is not far). Why isn't that anti-Semitic?
Why should Israeli and Jew be identical?
Anti-Semitism consists in the assertion that a "Jew", meaning a person of the Jewish faith, has innate characteristics that make him greedy and dishonest to distract and to give the anger about the squeeze an outlet. In the Weimar Republic, and even more so under the National Socialists, intellectuals and the political class used ancient symbols for greed (fangs) and falsehood (eye color) that people of the Jewish faith were born with. There were scientists who measured the shape of skulls in order to "scientifically" underpin these theses. But the symbols have probably been around for as long as human societies have existed. And they have been used by artists of all ages.
Also, the activities of secret services on behalf of governments have never been held in high esteem. The fact that artists perceive this activity as a threat and use animal associations in their depiction always fell under artistic freedom in enlightened societies. In the comics, if they are not from Disney, that goes without saying. It has nothing to do with racism or even anti-Semitism.
The anti-Semitic narrative is a political method of domination that the political class in Germany uses in a perfidious reversal to bring it into line internally and externally.
In the US, there was Senator McCarthy and the Communist hunt, and Nixon rose to the presidency on that wave. With us, the Greens are way ahead when it comes to poisoning the cultural climate. In the run-up to the opening of the Documenta, the organizers were asked to make a commitment against anti-Semitism so that criticism of the system would under no circumstances shine through. But without systemic criticism, art is irrelevant.
Of course, the German bourgeois is now using his tax money against the art exhibition. Maybe Germany is really no longer a suitable place for the Documenta.
Book burning in Kassel
Who is a Jew?
Is an Israeli a Jew? no Nationality can not match the term.
Does it characterize a Jew that he grew up in a Jewish culture and accepted Jewish values? Yes, one can agree with this definition.
Does this person have any physical or other qualities inherent in them that they were born with? no
But the anti-Semitic ideology rests on this narrative, according to which greed and falsehood are typical of Jews; even the highly privileged M. Luther could not free himself from it.
Today, these malicious insinuations are no longer commonplace, and ordinary people don't listen to such whisperings. But the ideologues of the declining middle class keep rediscovering this narrative to direct the hatred and outrage that have their roots in social inequality and to divert attention from their own privileges. The pogroms of history have always had winners in the middle class, such as the elimination of competitors and the consolidation of power structures.
The German political class, and to some extent also the European one, use anti-Semitism as a means of political struggle by accusing unpopular opponents of anti-Semitism. The new democracy movement can easily shake it off and only smile wearily. But even critical journalists such as N. Strotmann have internalized the anti-Jewish stereotypes to such an extent that they can deduce anti-Semitic intentions from a compilation of external characteristics and cannot recognize the core of the artistic statement.
And the artists from the southern hemisphere do not know the perfidy and intrigue of the stupid German politicians. They use ancient symbols that were also used by the Nazis and thus draw attention to abuses. As soon as they point to the oppression of the Palestinians, anti-Semitism is almost automatically insinuated, and the supposedly liberal press pounces on them, blustering about hate speech. At most, it is permitted to refer to the Aborigines' demand for land. Australia is far enough away, but Africa, where the West dumps scrap, rubbish and rags, is where things get critical, then there is talk of the limits of artistic freedom.
But works as pleasing as those by the craftsman J. Koons don't bother anyone and are applauded.
The Nazis, too, completely twisted the term “kitsch” and, like any other dictatorship, insisted on cultural hegemony. The burning of books seemed appropriate to the dictatorship of the time, now media agitation is being pursued, artists have to take down their works, further de-installations are threatened, artists are to be uninvited and documenta rooms are to be closed. There should only be money if politically acceptable works of art are shown, they call it: "The government should be directly involved in the artistic structures".
It is very questionable whether anyone will still want to look at the works of art in this new normal.
“What must not be, is not reported. Since almost only vaccinated and boosted people (9 out of 10) are still in the intensive care units as corona patients and are reported as corona dead, DIVI and RKI stopped publishing the vaccination status without further ado. Even those who suffer from Long-Covid are mostly boosted. Mostly younger, previously healthy people who fell ill with Corona after the booster. After all, reports of individual vaccination victims have made it into the public domain”
https://tkp.at/2022/06/29/pflegeethik-initiative-corona-schutz-ein-einziges-desaster-und-ethisch-menschlich-zu-keiner-zeit-vertretbar/
http://andreastriebel.de/?p=4280