Declaration by doctors and scientists for health, freedom and democracy
Declaration of the MWGFD eV on allegations against several doctors
Statement of the MWGFD eV on allegations against several physicians
In recent weeks, several doctors' residences and practices have been searched by police on charges of "issuing incorrect health certificates." What was meant was the issuance of certificates for mask exemption….
In the past few weeks, several houses and practices have been searched by the police on charges of "issuing incorrect health certificates". What was meant was the issuing of certificates for a mask exemption.
Based on international specialist literature, which is cited below, the MWGFD eV explains the following. The association opposes the mask requirement in public, because this compulsion is medically unfounded and the wearing of masks itself causes various health problems. When issuing mask release certificates to patients seeking help, medical colleagues are guided by the following scientifically verifiable facts:
A) Extensive epidemiological studies have clearly shown that people without symptoms of the disease do not spread COVID-19 pneumonia to the general public (1, 2). Virus transmission by asymptomatic people can occasionally, if rarely, take place among members of a household, but then never leads to serious illness. Virus transmission outside the home is a very rare occurrence and never leads to pneumonia. This is probably related to the vanishingly small viral load that is released into the air we breathe (3). No outbreak of COVID-19 (pneumonia) has ever emerged from schools, educational establishments or universities worldwide. This means that the justification given for the sensibility and necessity of a general mask requirement in the general public and especially in schools is null and void.
B) The fact that prescribed measures such as wearing a mask do not have a relevant effect on the infection process is known. The renowned independent US institute “National Bureau of Economic Research” (NBER) comes to this conclusion in its meta-analysis with data from 24 countries and 25 US states (4). Another study, in which 180 countries were compared with regard to the influence of different factors, also found that the response of the governments did not influence the number of deaths, but other factors were decisive (5).
C) Instead of being beneficial, wearing masks harbors a wide range of health risks (6). The mere fact that there is pronounced carbon dioxide rebreathing gives rise to legal doubts about the mask requirement. The carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere, including the air outdoors, is 0,04 percent by volume (vol%). The Federal Environment Agency gives a questionable CO2Concentration exceeds 0,2 vol%. This is also seen as a limit value for children and pregnant women. The maximum workplace concentration (MAK), i.e. the value that is reasonable for healthy adults at the workplace, is 0,5 vol%.
In September 2020, a measurement on three test subjects (two adults and one child) by Dr. Helmut Traindl show that the CO2 Concentration behind fabric masks reaches health-threatening levels (7). In a recent study, a South Tyrolean team found the CO2- Values of inhaled air measured behind cloth masks in 24 people (including seven children). The values determined were between 0,8 and 2,4 vol% - the lowest value was thus clear and the highest value almost five times as high as the permissible concentration at the workplace of an adult (8). Children have significantly higher oxygen needs than adults and are much more sensitive to any increases in carbon dioxide. The concentrations measured behind the masks were 4 to 12 times higher than the maximum value of 0,2 vol% set for children.
The increase in the carbon dioxide concentration in the inhaled air leads to typical symptoms of headaches, concentration disorders, dizziness, nausea, cardiac arrhythmias, blood pressure problems and even cardiovascular collapse. These are complaints that mask wearers describe to doctors every day.
There are also psychological problems, such as fear and panic when wearing a mask.
D) In summary, there can be no doubt that a general mask requirement in schools or in public is incompatible with the applicable health protection laws. It is the duty of every responsible doctor to inform himself about these facts and to use this knowledge to protect and maintain the health of the patients. The colleagues issuing the certificates have only fulfilled their duty. The MWGFD e. V. stands by you and your medical actions without reservation.
References:
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32453686/pshttps://www.nature.com/ar
- https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w
- https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0843-2
- https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w27719/w27719.pdf
- https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2020.604339/full
- https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/a-1174-6591
- https://www.afa-zone.at/kostenlose-info-downloads/
- https://2020news.de/italien-studie-belegt-stark-erhoehten-co2-wert-unter-der-maske/
You cite a carbon dioxide concentration behind the mask of up to 2,4%. When inhaled, the concentration in the lungs reaches this high value by far - the air behind the mask is diluted by the inhaled air. They ignore this fact.
What kind of measures do you propose that are more effective than the previous ones?
Then measure the concentration in the periphery of the lungs of a mask wearer. Why is he dizzy? why does he get a headache?
What do I propose? Away with the masks. They are medically / medically harmful. Wearing a mask is a purely political measure. It makes communication more difficult for people and symbolizes and extends the corona madness. There is no reason to stop Covid-20 except in intensive care units.