Fact checker, fact denier
Despite the huge propaganda of the government and the mainstream media, the extent of the Corona fraud is becoming increasingly clear to the general public and resistance is growing. A jumble of fact checkers is being summoned in the media to justify the government's actions....
Despite the massive propaganda from the government and mainstream media, the general public is becoming increasingly aware of the extent of corona fraud and resistance is gaining momentum. A mass of fact-checkers is being rushed to the media to justify government action.
Example: The Süddeutsche Zeitung, one of the most influential newspapers, has caused its entire science department to take action against “dangerous webs”. They claim:
- Regardless of the fact that every virus that spreads epidemically is always “new”, this virus is particularly new because it induces molecular innovations, therefore it is particularly dangerous. But that is what all viruses do and why this virus is now particularly dangerous, Katrin Zinkat does not have to provide evidence, she leaves it at the claim.
- Hanno Charisius believes that the government opponents would claim that the tests would increase the number of infections. As evidence, he cites D. Trump of all people. He is distracting from the fact that his newspaper has graphed the absolute number of infections all the time until recently. This panic curve was misleading; it was an alleged exponential increase. In fact, the number of people who tested positive rose from the 12th to the 14th KW from about 7000 to 8000 to 9000 per 100 tests. No statistician calls this an exponential increase.
- Berit Uhlmann, on the other hand, says that the number of cases did not decrease until the beginning of April, which is why government intervention has curbed the epidemic. In fact, however, there is a notification delay of two to three weeks and the average time between infection and death is 23 days, so that the peak of the infection is to be set on March 3rd and 4th and no later than 11th week at the latest Withdrawal of the virus could doubt.
- Werner Bartens claims that Covid-19 would infect more organs (without providing numbers) and would therefore result in higher mortality than other pathogens. He later narrowed his claim and said that the mortality rate was higher in severe cases. He wants to substantiate this theory by claiming that there have been drastic restrictions since March, otherwise the number of victims would have been higher. He prefers not to mention that the Corona dead were all described as positive, including traffic victims. The number of 25 deaths in the 000/2017 flu season was only extrapolations and now there could be 18 corona deaths by summer. Who spreads crude ideas here?
- Christina Berndt, actually a natural scientist, also spreads delighted: "In the meantime, excess mortality has arrived". So in January, February and March, when the virus was spreading at great speed, the virus held back in its dangerousness and led to an under-mortality and in April, when the spread decreased sharply, the virus suddenly led to an increased mortality ? “Now excess mortality cannot be denied”. There is no need to comment on such crude claims.
- Christina Kunkel does not want to put up with the fact that the virus usually contributes to death in very old and very sick people. The average age of the deceased was 82 years. That they would have lived for about nine years without Covid-19 is a dubious claim. Ms. Kunkel refers to a Scottish study. (McAllister)
- Mr. Hütten wants to admit that the immune system is a good protection against a virus infection, but he thinks that young people who had actually been healthy also died from the virus infection. In fact, this is not for Covid-19 specific, it has always been there.
Under no circumstances do these journalists want it to be true that the corona virus has disappeared, although all the well-known epidemiologists in the world have said so beforehand. Only in December does something “new” come to the fore again.
The error rate for validated tests is 3 to XNUMX percent, which means that tests are false positive in this area and the numbers are now also in this area.
There are now many serious publications, for example in Lancet, that publish the current knowledge about Covid-19 and its difference to previously known viruses. (You can google it!) Why not read it first before posting dubious falsehoods and allegations online. Or is the problem that Lancet publishes in English and you can't do it enough? Where do such dubious statements come from that 50% of all Germans are immune to the virus? Who found that out scientifically? Where's the facts? It is only alleged and rushed without naming sound sources, that is dubious.
The author should also know that there are a number of idiots who are just looking for an opportunity to reduce their frustration by violating others. Then maybe a “charlatan” comes up, like Prof.Dr. Drosten, who wants to reprogram people as the henchmen of dubious powers, was just in place to kill him. In retrospect you will then say: "I didn't want that!" But it was worth it to me to fool around and put people down!
It is correct and necessary that the doctors now deal in detail with the consequences of the virus attack. So far, however, no specific features of Covid-19 have been found that would justify attributing this virus a special role in its dangerousness. So far, the dead have not been examined so thoroughly in the previous flu epidemics; however, fifty years ago (1969) it was found that embolism and thrombosis in the flu season are among the leading causes of death in respiratory infections between the tenth and fourteenth day after the onset of symptoms. The doctors then treated with heparin and were successful. This has been published scientifically.
The claim that viral flu is a one-organ disease comes up to anyone who has had it. However, the claim is eagerly spread by the media in order to maintain its (conspiracy) theory of the particular dangerousness of Covid-19.
Of course, Mr. Drosten is also at risk from assassins, but so far it has hit opponents of government propaganda. The bomb attack on the truck, which brought brochures for the Stuttgart demonstration, could have claimed the lives of people. The agitation of the mainstream media is unscrupulous.
Video on May 06.05th recorded at “The Missing Part” Dr. Knut Wittkowski: "The pandemic is over."
"That all those who tested positive were referred to as corona deaths, including road traffic victims .."
This is nonsense! Traffic fatalities have never been counted / represented as Covid 19 victims in any country in the world!
This nonsense comes from Mr. Wieler. This official has ordered that all deceased who have tested positive be counted as corona dead.
The statement by Mr. Wieler refers to those people who had one or more previous illnesses and who then died from these previous illnesses with a corona infection. Admittedly, this is not entirely clean, but portraying it as a car accident at RKI is a pre-existing condition is very far from the goal.
Rule of thumb: If the head is 20 cm next to the person, it is no longer counted as a corona victim.
The further back the epidemic, the crazier the theories of the press.
Now the “Süddeutsche Zeitung” writes: “In the worst case, a reaction to the second wave would have to take place even faster than before the first outbreak in March. Because meanwhile there are no longer just individual foci of infection, the virus has long been spreading in Germany and could break out everywhere at the same time. "
What is this crude stuff? Do the authors have that of the confused white coat from the Charité? (Attention: no conspiracy theory, since government approved)