Who says A must say B

Now the SPD must end the austerity course with which Scholz and Schaeuble devastated the country: The billions that the Scholz clique has withdrawn from the economic cycle. Public contracts must be awarded to renovate whose roofs are defective and which bridges, and bridges in danger of collapsing.


The Schröder social laws (Hartz IV) must be abolished again, the SPD must dissociate itself from it reliably. Low wages have led to general depression. The buyer class for mass goods is smaller and smaller, while the sale of large-volume SUVs is not a sustainable business model.
Housing construction must be promoted so strongly that the speculative bubble collapses. A pension insurance must be reintroduced that pays back at least as the contributor has paid in.
SPD: Hunt down the CDU or go down.
Germany wants to be able to breathe again. Greece and Italy must be freed from their shackles. These countries can help themselves, but not under neoliberal control.
However, these measures would strengthen the self-confidence of large sections of the population. They would not be just material participation but also social co-determination. But then the political class wants no longer fence with the foil, but bring out the afd sword.

3 replies to "Who says A must also say B"

  1. Walter-Borjans and Esken are perceived as foreign bodies in the well-established system of the political-media establishment. This could be viewed with Anne Will and Markus Lanz on ARD and ZDF. Borjans and Esken were both remarkable, but those of the talk show host Will and Lanz. How smooth and smoothly the SPD chairman Scholz would have been. Now the political-medial system is developing a defensive reaction against Borjans and Esken which they can only survive politically if they show corbynitic qualities.

    1. Yes, they both must have Corbyn qualities to withstand the media pressure and pressure of the party establishment.
      How the media, television and the print media promoted Scholz was bold. The downfall of the SPD, an inevitable consequence of a Scholz election, was worth it to them; if only this terrible coalition would continue to rule. No government has ever had so many title cheaters who have gathered under the umbrella of Ms. Merkel. And Ms. Merkel defended that: she would not have hired scientists, but politicians. One had already thought that fraud was part of the political business. But it was amazing that the pastor's daughter still admits that openly. One was no longer surprised that the corruption of the “foreigner toll” had no consequences.
      And whether Scholz or Schäuble were finance ministers, there was no difference. That was also intentional: the SPD wanted to abbey with the upper classes.
      And now the upper-class layer of the SPD, which is served by offices, fears for its privileges. Without loud shouting and intrigues, they will not clear their posts. But Greens and FDP are already running hot to take their seats, govern and rule, that's too much of a lure, the media will join in. The main thing is that the costs of climate protection be deported to the lower strata.

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked