What an outrageous thing to do by the mainstream media!

to now present to us the son of the bloodthirsty Shah of Persia as a possible new ruler.

The CIA overthrew and killed Prime Minister Mossadegh in 1953 because he nationalized the country's oil fields and wanted to use the revenue to benefit the Iranians.

The average life expectancy in Iran at that time was 30. Small farmers were kept dependent through land reform, while large landowners grew ever richer. With torture, executions, and maximum repression, Pahlavi's father, under the guidance of the CIA, established a police state.

A very small upper class was able to share in the oil revenues. Women who now welcome a new Shah dictatorship are likely the granddaughters of these large landowners. But the relatives of those murdered and tortured by the regime threw red paint at the son. ARD refused to show the images and broadcast only pictures of smiling girls.

After Laschet received the Shah's son, it became clear why the CSU could not support him in his candidacy for Chancellor: a man with so little intuition does indeed seem unsuitable.

The CSU, too, has its dark past, as evidenced by Franz Josef Strauss's visit to the repugnant dictator Pinochet, who was also installed by the CIA and enforced his rule through mass executions. Not a word, however, about the regime of colonels in Argentina, which herded masses of people into football stadiums, bound them, and dropped them from airplanes over the sea. That, it seems, was their defense of Western values.

And now Merz is offering the German Navy's "help" in the Persian Gulf; but the Iranians will resolve that faster than the Afghans, who still had to defend themselves against Bundeswehr "help" with rifle bullets. Even the impoverished country of Mali was able to quickly rid itself of Bundeswehr "help."

And German pensioners will surely soon realize that they will have to pay for the military adventures.

4 Replies to “What an outrage from the MS media!”

  1. "It would be an oversimplification to treat all these crimes as identical. They arose in different historical contexts, were committed by different actors, and have different causes. And yet, they are united by a frightening structural similarity:

    Dehumanization: Before a people can be destroyed, it must first be dehumanized linguistically and symbolically. The Herero were referred to as "baboons" by German officers. Native Americans were described as "savages." Palestinians are referred to as "human animals" by Israeli politicians.

    Impunity for the perpetrators: In almost none of the cases described above were the main culprits prosecuted. The international community looks on, protests politely – and continues doing business.

    Silence of the “civilized world”: The countries that today most loudly insist on human rights are often the same ones that committed these crimes or enabled them through arms deliveries, diplomatic protection and economic support.

    The suffering of the victims is downplayed: whether the suffering of the Herero, the Sioux, or the Palestinians – it is regularly portrayed as more "complicated" than it actually is. The perpetrators always have "reasons."
    What history teaches us – if we let it

    The sociologist W.E.B. Du Bois wrote as early as 1915 that colonialism and racism are not marginal phenomena of Western modernity, but rather its foundation. This thesis is uncomfortable – but it explains why the reckoning with colonial crimes is progressing so slowly, why reparations demands are so fiercely opposed, and why the West finds it so difficult to adopt a clear humanitarian stance in the case of Gaza.

    Coming to terms with history doesn't mean cultivating guilt or talking about an "inherited guilt" that supposedly obligates a country to support every crime committed by another country out of "reasons of state." It means understanding the mechanisms that make mass murder possible—so that we can recognize them when they happen again. And so that we can no longer say: "We didn't know."

    https://tkp.at/2026/05/19/das-erbe-des-vernichtungswillens-von-den-kolonialverbrechen-europas-bis-zur-zerstoerung-gazas/

  2. “But these are just the tips of the iceberg. And of course, they are always denied. Like the deliberate bombing of hospitals. The most well-known incident of a hospital bombing, officially acknowledged by the US, occurred on October 3, 2015, in Kunduz, Afghanistan. US warplanes repeatedly bombed a fully occupied trauma clinic run by Doctors Without Borders (Médecins Sans Frontières), killing 42 people, including patients and clinic staff.”

    https://tkp.at/2026/05/22/usa-kriegsverbrechen-des-westens-und-die-folgen/

  3. "Trump never had good intentions. He always planned to start a war against Iran in his second term, as soon as he no longer had to worry about his re-election. He has always been a sneaky warmonger, as vicious as almost anyone we have ever seen in the White House."

    Only evil people are ever allowed to pass the many checks and balances on the path to the presidency. To co-lead a murderous empire fueled by human blood, you have to be a psychopath. They only let you in once they've been sufficiently convinced that you're psychopathic enough to do the job.

    Trump gave them that certainty. That's the only reason he's where he is now."

    https://uncutnews.ch/trump-ist-kein-widerwilliger-kriegspraesident/

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked