Kiesewetter: Duty of service for all
This demand is made by CDU member Kiesewetter.
Conscription and compulsory military service for all are to be enforced by declaring a state of tension. In this state, fundamental rights are formally suspended;
To create fear and tension among the population and to have a justification for their actions, they are pushing forward militarization and talking about drones over Munich Airport, etc., allegedly sent by Putin. The UFOs sighted in Germany certainly have a higher degree of truth than Russian drones over Germany. Yet Kiesewetter is allowed to spread his war propaganda at the Protestant Church Congress. How corrupt are the state churches? But it was no different under Nazi rule.
And this method has already worked with the coronavirus. The media and the judiciary are fully on the government's course. The governing parties want to do better this time than the Nazis, who needed countless concentration camps to crush all resistance. They constantly invoke Russian aggressiveness. But the population isn't yet ready to "shoot back." People would rather trade with Russia and would gladly buy Russian gas there. But the political class is making its survival dependent on the war in Ukraine. This doesn't seem so wrong after all, because the constant war propaganda from Kiesewetter, Merz, and the rest, and the immense rearmament, are swallowing up so many billions and driving away useful industries, that disaster is foreseeable.
A new government will have no substance left, because Germany's wealth is tied up in tanks, grenades, and Ukraine. A new beginning like the one in 1945 will then be necessary. It remains to be seen whether the generation of politicians leading us into catastrophe will also expect the kind of leniency that Nazi politicians experienced in the 1950s.
The Porsche family did well by pandering to the Nazis and is now once again profiting from the rearmament. And the major capital accumulation institutions are experiencing increases in their share prices. And if a currency cut occurs, because tanks and grenades don't create wealth but only destroy capital, capital owners will once again be the winners, just as they were after the Second World War.
But no alliance against Russia can be formed because France is staggering into incapacity to act, and class conflicts in England are so preoccupying the political class that the country can barely bear to participate in a war against Russia. All that remains is the Merz-led CDU with its junior SPD partner, which is constantly issuing new war loans but certainly can't achieve anything on its own and with German soldiers in Ukraine (once the Russian bear strikes with its nuclear paw, there won't be much left of the Bundeswehr).
Will Kiesewetter, Merz, Pistorius and Co. ever be brought before a Nuremberg tribunal?
https://paulbrandenburg.com/videos/europas-eliten-wollen-krieg-patrik-baab
Roderich Kiesewetter, CDU foreign policy expert and former colonel in the Bundeswehr, has been one of the loudest voices for years when it comes to rearmament, arms deliveries, and military support for Ukraine. But in recent months, he has become even more vocal. Hardly a talk show goes by in which Kiesewetter doesn't call for the next step: more weapons, more engagement, less restraint. While other members of parliament are still trying, at least rhetorically, to maintain a balance between aid and escalation, Kiesewetter knows no bounds. For him, any doubt about maximum support for Ukraine is a betrayal of Western values.
His language increasingly resembles that of a NATO spokesman. It's no longer about German interests, no longer about the question of what this country can actually cope with. It's all about slogans of perseverance, about the image of a "victory" that has long been out of reach. Particularly problematic is Kiesewetter's repeated attempts to make NATO and Germany indistinguishable. When he speaks, it sounds as if Berlin has long since become an outpost of NATO headquarters.
Officially, the government emphasizes that it does not want war. But its language, its actions, and its decisions speak a different language. Merz, with his contradictory messages, Pistorius, with his normalization of the concept of war, Kiesewetter, with his NATO rhetoric, all contribute to making war conceivable, even prepared for, in Germany again. Added to this is the economic madness of seeking access to Russian funds as if they could rewrite the world order. In reality, this risks the trust of international investors and the stability of Germany's own economy.
The reality in Ukraine has long since shown that this war can hardly be won militarily. But instead of drawing conclusions and initiating negotiations, those in charge are clinging to slogans of perseverance and illusions."
https://www.manova.news/artikel/der-krieg-der-worte-2
"47% of the employable recipients of basic social security benefits or social assistance are foreigners (N=1.835.630). The largest group, with approximately 700.000 recipients, comes from Ukraine. They are fleeing directly into the German social security system; although they are able to work, they live on taxpayer support.
Source: Federal Employment Agency
Source: Federal Employment Agency
2.883.180 recipients of basic social security of 563 euros per adult, plus a wide range of benefits, live in a so-called community of need: families of benefit recipients, single parents, cohabiting couples, all of them with children for whom additional benefits are payable.
The figures we have just presented are immense; they have reached a level that is unsustainable in the long term, unsustainable simply because the age cohorts that bear the brunt of the tax burden, whose members pay the most taxes, will be retiring in the coming years. Not only will this eliminate significant tax payments, but entitlements will also become due, because the "boomers," as they are called, have paid vast sums into the statutory pension insurance system over the course of their lives and now want to claim the promised pension benefits, receive a pension that they have pre-financed over decades, money that generation after generation of political thugs has misappropriated, stolen, and used to serve a specific clientele and buy their votes.
But the embezzled sums are not the problem, nor are the horrendous expenses to finance people who have never made a contribution to Germany the problem, no, the boomers are the problem, the people who have kept the system running all this time and now want to collect the promised pension to which they have been entitled for decades.
Meanwhile, Germany is on the verge of national bankruptcy. The large sums currently being juggled by political players cannot disguise this fact. The lavish social systems can no longer be financed in their current form. Reform is urgently needed, because the bus is now stuck in mud up to the bottom of the windshield, and besides, it's starting to rain.
But no one moves on the bus.
Even a miniature reform that doesn't really deserve the name, such as the much-heralded overhaul of the citizen's income, of which only the tightening of the screws remains, meets with fierce resistance from those who have made it their mission to prevent any attempt by a government to save money."
https://sciencefiles.org/2025/10/18/buergergeldreform-populistisches-ablenkungsmanoever-warum-deutschland-nicht-zu-retten-ist/
"It is Ukraine that has to lose for no reason. It has to lose because of the demographic catastrophe with – according to some estimates – 1,7 million dead, and it has to lose because of the political situation, which is completely devastated, with a president who arbitrarily decided to remain in office despite the end of his (illegitimate) term, as well as because of the economic situation, which was already catastrophic before the conflict. How long do the madmen in Kyiv intend to continue this mass suicide? Because if things continue like this, no one will want Ukraine after the conflict, no one will want to invest in the reconstruction of such a badly damaged territory."
https://tkp.at/2025/10/20/trump-selenskyj-alle-liebesgeschichten-gehen-frueher-oder-spaeter-zu-ende/