What does the AfD want?
Does it also want to spend 200 billion euros a year on armaments?
- The CDU wants to continuously increase spending from the current 86 billion to 200 billion.
Does the AfD also want to build 72 new barracks and have 100.000 young men do their dirty work there? Pistorius, Klingbeil, and Merz never tire of promoting this.
Does the AfD want to support this course?
- Merz is constantly ranting against Russia and even threatening to send German troops into Ukraine. The AfD, however, takes a different stance on this, preferring diplomatic solutions. They also want to restart the Russian natural gas pipeline.
- The CDU wants to cut pensions and constantly has its youth organization proclaim that young people should not be disadvantaged compared to older people; it is trying to play young people off against old people.
Does the AfD want to play this unfair game?
- The CDU wants to make it more difficult or even abolish pensions after 45 years of work. Will the AfD support this plan?
- The CDU wants to cut the citizen's allowance for all recipients. Does the AfD also want these cuts for German recipients or only for migrants? A clear statement on this has not been received.
- The CDU is sawing off continued payment of wages in case of illness
What is the AfD’s position on this?
- The CDU absolutely does not want compensation for vaccine victims. The AfD has already held two hearings on the issue in the Bundestag.
Does the AfD intend to support the planned social devastation? The popular refrain, if one does go along with it, is "out of political responsibility."
Then Germany would be out of the frying pan and into the fire if the AfD were to participate in the government
Prof. S. Homburg on Twitter on 19.09.25
"Germany must reduce its CO2 emissions to zero at all costs. China and India, on the other hand, are exempt from the requirements of the Paris Agreement as 'developing countries.' The USA has withdrawn from the agreement entirely.
Background: Regardless of one's stance on CO2 theories, Germany's course only makes sense as a kind of death drive. Our successful industry, the primary financier of the welfare state, is being destroyed and driven abroad.
But the emissions won't disappear, they'll just be somewhere else. Unfortunately, the conservative-red coalition will remain firmly on Habeck's course, prioritizing the absurd "climate target" over economic and social concerns.
Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance on 18.09.25 on Twitter:
“How much can a Chancellor actually distract from the real problems?
Friedrich #Merz says that “we” lived beyond our means, while four families in Germany own as much wealth as half the population.
Friedrich Merz says that the welfare state can no longer be financed, while his disastrous economic and energy policies are driving the number of unemployed to over 3 million.
Friedrich Merz says that Putin is destabilizing our society, while Germany will soon have transferred 50 billion euros to Ukraine, but will have "no leeway" to relieve the burden on low and middle incomes…
"If you absolutely want to protect yourself from SARS-CoV-2, use an antihistamine containing azelastine. It's cheaper than COVID-19 shots. It's not nearly as dangerous to your health as COVID-19 shots, and you can get it over-the-counter precisely because it's not nearly as dangerous as the largely useless COVID-19 shots—and—yes, it works, is SAFE AND EFFECTIVE, unlike the COVID-19 shots!"
https://sciencefiles.org/2025/09/21/niemand-benoetigt-impfstoffe-gegen-covid-19-nasenspray-gegen-heuschnupfen-schuetzt-besser/
"The redistribution machine is running at full speed. Where the money spigot for defense spending is overflowing, the spigot for social benefits is only dripping. And even that is already too much, if you believe those voices in politics and the media who are urging people to tighten their belts. The welfare state is no longer affordable. To conceal this obvious contradiction, all the stops are being pulled out in terms of propaganda-based number-crunching. Because in the end, it's about far more than gradual cuts in the social sector. What is euphemistically referred to as 'reform' is in reality nothing less than the comprehensive erosion of the welfare state. The welfare state is constitutive of a republic in which people can live in dignity—the dignity that is enshrined above all else in the Basic Law."
https://www.manova.news/artikel/delegitimierung-des-sozialstaates
Sahra Wagenknecht on September 21.09, 25 on Twitter:
During the budget discussions, Chancellor Merz announced his intention to implement far-reaching cuts in the welfare state – translated: a further deterioration in pensions, healthcare, long-term care, and unemployment benefits. While there is apparently no money for "social promises," the financial resources for #weapons and war preparations are apparently unlimited: Military spending is to be increased to a total of 108 billion euros as early as next year. And while the budget planning for 2027 already shows a funding gap of 30 billion euros, a further significant increase in military spending to 136 billion euros (i.e., 136.000.000.000 euros) is planned for 2028. Of course, no welfare state can withstand such an increase in armament. If Merz and Klingbeil can pull off four years of this, our social systems will be in ruins. This makes it all the more important to continue to exert pressure to clear the way for a proper recount of the federal election. Because then the BSW would very likely enter the Bundestag because it was elected by more than 5 percent of voters – and the unspeakable Merz coalition would no longer be able to continue to run our country into the ground, because it would no longer have a parliamentary majority."
“Who comes out on the short end when it comes to life expectancy:
Men, who already have a lower life expectancy than women and whose prospects for a carefree and materially secure old age are more severely affected by an increase in the retirement age than those of women.
Workers and those employed with a steady but low wage in physically demanding jobs who are already more likely to die earlier than the average life expectancy would suggest.
These two groups are being fleeced to cover up the fact that political gangsters have been diverting and squandering pension fund contributions for years. Members of parliament, civil servants, all those who benefit from the diverted pension fund funds are spared the consequences of the redistribution from poor to rich, which represents an increase in the retirement age.
https://sciencefiles.org/2025/09/26/sozialer-sprengstoff-rentenumverteilung-von-arm-nach-reich-vor-allem-maennliche-arbeitssklaven-betroffen/