Electronic patient record

A totalitarian attack on patient rights

The intimate conversation between doctor and patient is part of the core of the human. No state power may have a claim to complicity. This was and is so in all human societies.

The protection of intimacy is absolute and is one of the inalienable fundamental rights and cannot be overridden by any legislator.

But this protection stands in the way of a complete domination of man. Therefore, totalitarian governments try by all means to remove this protection and gain access.

The German red-green government uses all kinds of threats and lures to get this data. Scaremongering, legal coercion and deception, no means are left out.

Even the judiciary is involved. As a precaution, the public prosecutor's offices have been left under the authority of the state governments. The corresponding Nazi law was not abolished after the war, contrary to assurances. But the government also has great influence on the promotion of judges. In this way, she finds willing judges for her request for access to patient files. What kind of judges are they throwing all principles of law overboard to seize patients' private information?

But since a senior CDU functionary has become the supreme judge, the magistrates think they can also do anything. After the collapse of the Nazi regime, hardly any judges were punished, and old Nazi judges still romped about at the Federal Court of Justice. Do the judges who are now preparing the way for totalitarianism hope for the same leniency?

In various cities, district judges have issued search warrants in the wake of the Corona madness to confiscate patient files. Instead of being accused of this abuse of their authority, they are still in office. But who is surprised when a completely unscrupulous violent criminal heads the Ministry of Health and the presidents of his institutes legitimize him? Nobody needs to hope for the yellow jelly in the Justice Department.


18 Replies to “Electronic Patient Record”

  1. Press release from April 06.03.2023rd, XNUMX

    Free medical profession: Personal medical data without protection in the future?

    Hamburg/ Essen – Federal Minister of Health Lauterbach recently announced a paradigm shift in the handling of medical data: Instead of being subject to medical confidentiality as before, in future the medical data of all citizens in Germany will be automated and stored in central data collections from the doctor’s office become. In order to be available there in the future on request to anyone who claims to "have something to do with medicine" for evaluations in Germany and in the "European Health Data Space" EHDS planned by the EU Commission. Regardless of whether it is about pharmaceutical research, health policy or health management. A state research data center is to decide on the release. At the same time, the aim of the EU Commission is that this disease data can also be requested and evaluated Europe-wide in the future, in the case of so-called "research interests" without the patient concerned being able to object.

    "The entire plan aims to abolish medical confidentiality and the patient's right to informational self-determination at the same time," criticizes Dr. Silke Lüder, deputy chairwoman of the Free Medical Association and general practitioner in Hamburg, is in favor of the project.

    Doctors' trust room instead of a European data room
    The protection of disease data in the confidential space of medical practices and clinics remains an essential basis of our work," says the doctor. "Without this protected space, we can neither make correct diagnoses nor carry out appropriate treatment," explains Dr. luder. "If people can no longer be sure that what is said there will also remain in this room, they will no longer express themselves openly in the future or, in the worst case, will no longer go to the doctor".

    Dishonest bluff about volunteering
    “For decades it was promised that the introduction of a central medical record called EPA (Electronic Patient Record) would be voluntary for the insured. Now that there has been no real interest in the file among the citizens for 2 years, Mr. Lauterbach is doing a 180 degree turn and wants to make the whole thing mandatory. Not only for the patients, but also for the doctors,” criticizes the chairman of the independent medical association, Wieland Dietrich. "This shows the dishonesty of the political arguments as well as the strength of the lobbying interests of the healthcare industry, which wants to earn more in the international competition for disease data. However, completely different things are important for good medicine in our country,” adds Dietrich. "The discussion as to whether politicians can undermine the right to informational self-determination of citizens with regard to their most intimate data with the stroke of a pen is open!"

    Which is really important for good medicine
    “Completely different things would be important for good medicine: proper financing of outpatient medicine, the reduction of the absurd bureaucracy in medical practices, sufficient staff in practices, clinics and care facilities. Instead, billions have been siphoned from the health care system for 20 years in order to force a completely failed telematics project which has so far been a total flop. And now also undermining data protection nationally and internationally would neither strengthen trust in politics nor improve medicine," adds Dietrich. "In the future, we will step up our commitment to maintaining medical confidentiality and the self-determination of our patients together with patient associations and data protection organizations."

    About the Free Medical Association
    The Free Medical Association e. V. (FÄ) is an association that represents the medical profession as a freelance profession. It was founded in 2004 and today has more than 2.000 members: mainly general practitioners and specialists as well as various medical networks. The chairman of the federal association is Wieland Dietrich, a dermatologist in Essen. The aim of the FÄ is independent medicine, in which the patient and doctor are the focus and medical confidentiality is maintained.
    --------------------------------
    V. i. s.d. P: Wieland Dietrich, Free Medical Association, Chairman, Gervinusstraße 10, 45144 Essen, Tel.: 0201 68586090, email: mail@frei-aerzteschaft.de, Internet: http://www.freie-aerzteschaft.de

  2. https://sciencefiles.org/2023/03/16/erdrueckende-belege-autoimmunerkrankungen-durch-covid-19-shots-verursacht-man-kann-es-nicht-mehr-abstreiten/

    “A pretty bad story such an autoimmune disease. It generally manifests itself in a permanent, chronic inflammation, with the location of the inflammation being variable. Over 100 different autoimmune diseases are currently known. Ascending trend. They are all characterized by the fact that the body's own immune system, which is actually a protective shield against viruses, bacteria, parasites or whatever does not belong in the organism, can no longer distinguish between "foreign" and "endogenous" and thus begins to create healthy endogenous tissue attack and destroy.

    The link between vaccines and autoimmune responses has been known for a long time, to those who deal with it, not to those who are supposed to get the needle.”

  3. Jews against media hate speech

    This letter was written by Jews who have come together internationally. It is aimed at politicians and the media, but also and above all at our fellow human beings who stand by idly or who make a valuable contribution through anticipatory obedience.

    We mourn the death of Clemens Arvay. What drove this gentle man to end his life at the age of forty-two? What drove a loving father to abandon his son? Always factual and focused on a conflict-free discussion, devoted to nature and music ... how desperate must Clemens Arvay have been that he gave up everything he loved because he saw no way out?

    There is hardly a worse insult to a decent person than to be called an "anti-Semite". When the advocates of the dominant opinion—or rather, the opinion of the dominant ones—unprovokedly brandish the anti-Semitic mace, they condone the pain and despair they cause.

    Clemens Arvay was also exposed to such agitation and was denigrated as an anti-Semite. We are no longer in a position to ask him what the ultimate trigger for his decision was. But one question that can and must be asked of the rabble-rousers – the affected media outlets, including some leading newspapers and individual beneficiaries of political favors – is: Are you moved by the thought that this death might have something to do with your rabble-rousing? It doesn't matter what the ultimate trigger was, but you must address the possibility that you could be responsible for Clemens' final, irreversible decision.

    This death breaks the dam. The pent-up horror at the way you deal with what is sacred to us, what has shaped us, what causes our pain and our knowledge, moves us to write this letter.

    An anti-Semite is a Jew-hater. Those who tried to exterminate the Jews of Europe eighty years ago were anti-Semites.

    Nazis are eugenicists, mass murderers who denigrate, abuse and kill people out of their supposed racial superiority.

    Using these terms against people who merely question the vaccination agenda that has become religion, advocate for peace negotiations, or otherwise oppose a political or media trend is an unacceptable trivialization of Nazism and the Holocaust. Such an inflationary comparison of dissidents with mass murderers is a mockery of the victims of National Socialism. Some of these victims are the ancestors of the signers of this letter, our parents and grandparents. And the signatories know firsthand what separates a dissenting biologist with such impressive human integrity from an anti-Semite.

    The anti-Semitism baton is used as a weapon against critics of government policies. Like any weapon, it causes destruction. Like any weapon, it is a means of oppression and violence. We don't want that!

    Why do we find ourselves able to say, "Enough is enough"? Because the impression is created that we, the Jews, are the ones holding the baton of anti-Semitism. That it is us who want to be protected from the "swearers", "conspiracy theorists", "Nazis" and "right-wing extremists". That it was us who supposedly wanted to be protected from Clemens Arvay.

    We are also said to have asked for protection from Vera Sharav, Andrew Bridgen, Daniele Ganser, Sucharit Bhakdi, Neil Oliver, Roger Waters, Andrew Tate, Ken Jebsen and David Icke to name a few. We are said to have been the ones who demanded fashionable lawsuits for incitement to hatred and the downplaying of the Holocaust in Germany or renewed activity in Austria.

    Clemens Arvay was not an anti-Semite. We have not accused anyone of hurting him on our behalf.

    dr Daniele Ganser is not an anti-Semite. We don't want to be used to silence this historian because his opinion of the war contradicts the accepted narrative.

    Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi is not an anti-Semite. Far from representing all Jews, those who object to the scholar whose passionate enlightenment saved countless lives.

    Neil Oliver is not an anti-Semite, nor should he be defamed on our behalf.

    Andrew Bridgen is not an anti-Semite, and the fellow politician who vilified him as such has now been exposed for the corrupt and manipulative official that he is.

    The fact that Vera Sharav, a Holocaust survivor and lifelong advocate of medical ethics, is being prosecuted in Germany for Holocaust denial and hate speech makes all the more clear what we are dealing with. This is not done on our behalf.

    The same applies to each of the personalities mentioned and countless other critically thinking people who are denied, insulted, marginalized and robbed of their good name and their existence within the framework of the uniform Corona agenda according to a uniform principle - like according to a script.

    Every legal proceeding according to the paragraphs mentioned and every baseless insult as "Nazi", "anti-Semite" or "Holocaust denier" aims at the destruction of a reputation, a financial and social existence - or even a life. In a society that defines itself as liberal-democratic, we can never support such measures.

    Even more: We live in fear and worry: Whoever destroys lives in our name, whoever divides society, whoever agitates against a critical minority, justifies and promotes real anti-Semitism. And that's not all: the constantly cultivated fear of being insulted as a Nazi or anti-Semite robs people of civil courage and degrades our society to one that passively watches injustice.

    In his book Guide to Unhappiness, Paul Watzlawick writes:

    “What A says about B says a lot about A and little about B.”

    That says it all about the godless campaign against Clemens Arvay.

    To everyone who shares our pain and concern: take action! To the agitators and their contractors, will you at least have the grace to allow Clemens' son to be proud of his father? Will you right this wrong? Will you see the people behind the critics in the future? The fathers, mothers, lovers, sons, daughters and people like you who just don't share your opinion?

    Drawn,

    Jews for Justice - Jews for Enlightenment - We for Humanity

  4. Dear Johanna Strobel,

    as natural people – without genetic modification –
    we are all in great sorrow. Nothing this genetic
    Manipulation will ever be “sweat out”.
    Those who walk with the intention of 'playing God'
    will never be seen again. trust yours
    Thoughts, for these are the energy that contains all truth
    will bring to the light that all men long for.

    https://www.mwgfd.org/impfsymposium/

    I wish you all love and strength Johanna,

    Your Julia and Reinhold Alefelder

  5. “Until spring 2021, the cumulative excess mortality was still within reasonable limits. The more than 100.000 deaths described result predominantly from the time afterwards. Certainly many would still be alive if one had looked in the right place.
    Being aware of one's own ability to refuse knowledge, in short deliberately looking away, corresponds to the "sin against the Holy Spirit" from Christian moral theology. Matthew says that every sin will be forgiven, but not this one, either in this age or in the age to come. The ex-minister of a C party who had early on claimed a need for “forgive one another” should have thought of that. In the history of this pandemic, a lot has to do with deliberate, or rather organized, not looking. "
    https://tkp.at/2023/03/18/uebersterblichkeit-in-deutschland-auf-spurensuche-in-der-heatmap-fuer-2022-teil-iii/

  6. https://tkp.at/2023/03/21/turbo-hodenkrebs-bei-jungen-sportlern-pfizer-hat-behandlung/

    “An oncologist reflects on the striking number of testicular cancer cases in young athletes. It is often turbo cancer, as in the case of a young cricketer who died a few days after being diagnosed.

    21-year-old Daniel Donnan is dead. The Irish cricketer passed away days after being diagnosed with testicular cancer. He was taken to the hospital for a brain hemorrhage, but tests revealed that the cancer had already spread to his brain and lungs. "

  7. https://tkp.at/2023/03/23/neue-studie-zeigt-in-31-laendern-je-hoeher-die-durchimpungsrate-desto-hoeher-die-gesamtsterblichkeit/

    “There are still people in German-speaking countries who claim protection from the Corona vaccinations. Unfortunately, among them are health ministers and journalists, with probably the highest percentage being a professional group. Since the first quarter of 2021, however, there has been increasing data that the vaccination campaign is killing more people than the respiratory infections themselves, regardless of the virus. Younger people are often affected, which has led to a statistically significant decline in average life expectancy over the past two years.”

  8. March 23, 2023
    Another turn of the screw: Mass "vaccination" causes excess mortality - There's just no denying it anymore...

    ... if you're still in your right mind.

    The analyzes in which those responsible are not interested because they are too cowardly or too malicious or too inhuman or all together, the analyzes that mean that they have to confront the consequences of their actions and have to take responsibility for them, are back grown. Another study reveals what is obvious to anyone with any sanity left:
    The mass "vaccination" has caused EXCELLENCE.

    https://sciencefiles.org/2023/03/23/another-turn-of-the-screw-massenimpfung-verusacht-uebersterblichkeit-man-kann-es-einfach-nicht-mehr-abstreiten/

    The "pikes" do not protect, they harm, sometimes they cause final damage to the vaccinated. The frequency of these final “pikes” is so great that it translates into excess mortality, an achievement in itself, which is compounded by the fact that after a pandemic has passed, sub-mortality is usually seen because many of those infected by the pandemic pathogen were endangered, have died, becomes even greater. These COVID-19 sprays have significant killing potential, one that can be mapped to aggregate data in EXC-MORTALITY, but of course not limited to excess-mortality, for one has to get into the realm of excess-mortality first. That assumes a significant number of "pre" dead. You can think of it like a bucket that catches rainwater. In order for it to be filled with the amount of rainwater that has been measured for average rainy days in previous years, quite a bit of rain is needed. In order for it to be filled with more water than the average of previous years, significantly more rain is necessary, but all rain brings water....

    The study we're reporting on today is among the best we've seen of aggregate data analysis in decades. It's fun to see that there are again scientists who are able to handle aggregate data with dexterity like the following two:

    Aarstad, Jarle & Kvitastein, Olav Andreas (2023). Is there a Link between the 2021 COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake in Europe and 2022 Excess All-Cause Mortality?. Preprints 2023, 2023020350. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202302.0350.v1.

    The two scientists from the Western Norway University of Applied Sciences in Bergen have carried out an analysis whose result cannot be wiped off the table because it has blocked the path to alternative explanations. We'll tell you how in a nutshell now.

    The starting point is data on general excess mortality for 31 countries, the entire EU supplemented by Iceland, Norway and Switzerland. The data are available for the observation period on a monthly basis.

    Excess mortality is calculated, as usual, as the mortality above the average of the previous four years (2016 to 2019) for the same month. All analyzes are weighted based on the number of populations in each country. The excess mortality, if available, for the years 2020 and 2021 is included in the analysis as a control variable, as is life expectancy.

    We'll get to why in a moment.

    Since the point is to examine the effect that mass "vaccination" does or does not have on excess mortality, it is clear that one of the variables used to explain excess mortality is a proportion of the "vaccinated population". The authors choose to operationalize vaccination coverage as the proportion of the population that had at least two COVID-2021 shots at the end of 19. In order to take account of the fact that excess mortality does not take place in one month, but in several consecutive months, the authors differentiate according to the months in which the excess mortality occurred, a very smart solution because it allows the time history to be mapped in aggregate data.

    And now something to impress: The authors calculate ..., first take a deep breath, let's go:

    linear multi-level mixed-effect random intercept regressions,

    so ultimately linear representations for a development that takes place in different periods, in the present case in months. Results at the end of such analyzes are summarized in the table below.

    Eureka, a statistical analysis specifying a quality measure, Wald's chi-square in the present case, highly statistically significant for all models. So we are not interpreting hot air, but actual results. Results that essentially play out in the column labeled V*M. V*M depicts a cumulative effect resulting from the interaction of the proportion of the “vaccinated” population at the end of 2021 and the advancing first nine months of 2022. And as the months go by, the excess mortality increases, producing a significant effect indicated in the first model with the significant coefficient 0,105. ie for every percentage point that the proportion of a population who are “vaccinated” increases, the excess mortality in that country increases by 0,1%.
    Follow us on TELEGRAM

    In the words of the authors:

    “Model 1, Table 3, shows that vaccination uptake has a non-significant direct association with the dependent variable, but the significant monthly association indicates that the overall mortality tends to increase over time. The interaction between vaccination uptake and time passed in months since the beginning of 2022 (V*M) is strongly significant and implies that the mortality increases the higher the vaccination uptake. Specifically, it shows that a one percentage point increase in 2021 vaccination uptake is associated with an increase in monthly mortality in 2022 by 0.105 percent (95% CI, 0.075-0.134).”

    To illustrate the magnitude using Germany as an example. In Germany, at the end of 2021, 72,8% of the population had two COVID-19 injections. Had it only been 71,8%, mortality would have been reduced by around 8.000 people in the first nine months of 2022.”

  9. “The association with blood clots, myocarditis, heart attacks and strokes is now well established, as is the association with myelitis and neuropathy. (We predicted these side effects in our QRBD article Sorensen et al. 2020 June 2020 as blast analysis revealed 79% homologies to human epitopes, specifically PF4 and myelin).

    However, there is another reason to halt all vaccine programs. As a practicing oncologist, I have seen the disease progress rapidly in people in stable health after being forced to receive a booster shot, usually to allow them to travel.

    Even in my personal environment, I experience B cell disease after booster shots. They describe feeling significantly unwell a few days to weeks after the booster shot—one developed leukemia, two work colleagues had non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and an old friend who had been feeling like a long covid since the booster shot and who had multiple bone pains after severe pain Metastases from a rare B-cell disease were diagnosed.

    I am experienced enough to know that these are not the random anecdotes that many claim, especially since the same pattern is seen in Germany, Australia and the US."

    https://legitim.ch/renommierter-onkologe-warnt-davor-dass-sich-krebs-nach-der-covid-spritze-schnell-entwickelt-ich-bin-erfahren-genug-um-zu-wissen-dass-dies-kein-zufall-ist/

  10. https://tkp.at/2023/11/29/eu-am-weg-zum-totalitaeren-superstaat-parlament-beschliesst-zwang-zur-elektronischen-patientenakte-fuer-alle/

    “Again the core stripped of empty phrases: “… ALLOWING POLITICAL DECISION-MAKERS TO USE THIS ELECTRONIC HEALTH DATA.”

    Now the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) and the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) have taken the project further.

    Specifically, the EU law should oblige doctors to enter a summary of every patient treatment in the new health data room (Article 7). There are no exceptions or a right to object for particularly sensitive illnesses and therapies such as mental disorders, sexual illnesses and disorders such as potency deficiency or infertility, HIV or addiction therapies. “

  11. Data from millions of patients open online

    More than 59 million personal and medical records of patients are apparently freely accessible online.

    Aplite employees conducted a comprehensive internet-wide study to analyze the extent of the data leaks - with shocking results. 3.806 DICOM servers from 111 countries can be reached on the Internet. 1.159 of these servers would expose more than 59 million patients' personal and medical information. Over 73 percent of these servers would be hosted in the cloud or delivered over DSL; Less than 1 percent of DICOM servers on the Internet use effective authorization. The results were presented this week in London at the “black hat” event in London.

    Additionally, Aplite discovered new attacks that allow hackers to manipulate existing images. There is a risk of manipulation with more than 39,3 million health records.”

  12. “We could never have imagined that fundamental truths about human rights and freedoms would be dismissed as old-fashioned and no longer considered significant concerns. Our job is to simply go along as almost the entire planet is taken over by a technocratic oligarchy accountable to no one except the XNUMX percent of the ruling class.”
    The preparations in the EU

    One only needs to look at the laws and regulations being passed in a thoroughly corrupt EU these days. Today, December 13.12.2023th, XNUMX, the EU “Parliament” agenda includes the creation of a European Health Data Space, including a requirement for doctors to enter all and every treatment in it.

    More than 2/3 of Europeans reject the fact that industry can view our non-anonymized health data such as psychotherapy files without our consent for product development. The majority of MPs actually want to undermine medical confidentiality in the industry's profit interests.

    People want to convince us that good care or research would only be possible if patients were incapacitated in this way. We are in the process of creating the conditions for Lockdown 2.0 and the European health dictatorship.”

    https://tkp.at/2023/12/13/covid-hitech-coup-als-politischer-richtungswechsel-zum-autoritaeren-staat-und-gesundheitsdiktatur/

Write a comment on ys43 Cancel reply

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked