Why Merkel is continuing the corona fraud
The flu epidemic is over. The lock-down has led to a slight, barely measurable delay in the spread of the corona virus. Everywhere the spread lasted about forty days. Since the reports of a positive test result arrive at the RK Institute with a delay of about a fortnight, the mass media can now still report of new infectionctions….
The flu epidemic is over. The lock-down has resulted in a small, barely measurable delay in the spread of the corona virus. Everywhere the spread took about forty to sixty days. Since the reports of a positive test result arrive at the RK Institute with a delay of about fourteen days, the mass media can still report new infections.
The epidemiologist Wittkowski estimates that approximately fifty percent of the population has achieved immunity to the virus. All serious scientists who deal with epidemiology see the end of the wave.
Why are Merkel and the government using the Charité impostor to spread that a “second wave” is imminent? Although nothing like it has ever happened before. Why does Ms. Merkel explain “we are right in the middle of the epidemic”? Even though it was an outright lie?
Merkel and Putin, siblings in the spirit
Because she can; she has the power to do it. Power in itself is the greatest good for politicians. Just because Merkel coolly strives for power and knows no inhibitions, she reached the highest position. Whether Merkel or Putin, there is no difference. Both need an equivalent press. One can be celebrated for its austerity course, the other for its authoritarian style. The press, which was formerly referred to as left-wing liberal, has fully swung onto the neo-liberal course, ironing out criticism with so-called fact checks, while Putin, the station that does not broadcast the government course, has the police shut it down. The result is the same here as there: totalitarian control of public life down to the most private areas.
In order to perpetuate this situation, Merkel now speaks at the end of the epidemic that the epidemic has not yet reached its peak. She even picks up the dubious talk of a vaccination until the condition should last. And Adept Scholz proclaims a “new normal”; no matter how much he clings to power, he will probably no longer experience it as a politician.
The government had never taken care of death rates and old people in the homes. However, when on March 3, it became clear to all experts that the epidemic had peaked and began to subside as the year progressed, the government sought the support of the same clique that Desater had brought about with swine flu. It imposed the lock-down and plunged into the frenzy of power: it destroyed small, independent livelihoods, large sections of the population were dependent on government grants, seaside resorts were economically ruined, families with children were harassed, and schooling was suspended. The Charité virology clique promptly provides a pseudo-scientific reasoning according to which the school should be withheld. What a pitiful force it is to let off steam on children and on old people who are supposed to die alone!
Why wasn't the government ready to listen to the advice of the experts?
It was when the impending global economic crisis was gradually gaining attention.
Orders from abroad for machine tools have been decreasing continuously for 1,5 years. The auto industry had to produce on a large scale. Just in time was exhausted. Sales in China weakened. A trade war with the United States was difficult to suppress. Germany's foreign trade surplus and its dependence on it had grown to unbearable levels. While the work pressure for employees and the pace of work kept increasing, more and more people had to go to the table. The climate crisis consumed yields. The rigid adherence to the neoliberal austerity course could only end in collapse. This collapse was imminent for the informed economists.
At that moment, the government's Corona story came to the rescue: now it regained the initiative. The masses are disciplined. However, the emergency laws were quickly expanded to protect against a possibly improper judicial system. Power is now protected against six or eight million unemployed.
This is academically under the turf and as an independent person can hardly be endured. It's good that I went to a humanistic high school that made me a critical person who doesn't fall for everything.
Merkel and the media have conspired against the people. The theory of the malignant corona virus came as a call to them.
I am just wondering when the Corona epidemic is over, what are the dying people in Italy, Spain, UK, USA, Russia etc?
And now please don't go back to normal mortality! The statistics for these countries at euromomo are clear in terms of massive mortality.
At the end of the epidemic in Germany there can be no doubt, at least no serious epidemiologist doubts it. The talk of a second wave is disgusting scare tactics. The wave reached some countries in the world earlier, others later. According to the numbers of the RKI, the highlight was the 3rd / 4th. March. Since then, the number of those who tested positive in relation to the number of tests has been falling continuously, as previously said. However, the media cannot come to terms with the end: On April 29.04th. headlined the SZ "The calm before the virus storm?"
The statistics of deaths are a different topic. In Germany it is legally regulated in which period a death must be reported, so that the statistics relating to a month are reasonably reliable. This is not the case in other countries. If reporting is required within ten days in some areas and within six weeks in others, there is bias. The different counting probably led to the virus stopping at the border with Wales?
Statistics on the causes of death are also handled differently. In Belgium (not in Sierra Leone) it is suspected that it could be a Covid19 death to be counted as such in the statistics. Quite apart from the fact that there is still no test that clearly distinguishes Covid 19 from the other corona viruses. And then the positive result says nothing about whether humans have died from a virus. And if so, one would have to test between influenza, which is much more dangerous and corona, or both. But only a few university hospitals do that. In Hamburg do people die from the Corona virus and do they otherwise die from the virus?
It should also be borne in mind that the horror reports from the established media have so far all proven to be wrong. For Bergamo everything is chewed through. The reports about mass graves were also misleading for New York: The mass graves have been there for a long time and it is customary to bury poor people there. The tents in front of the hospitals were designed for the flu season in order to save unused capacity.
Now the media are falling on Brazil. The barrier to serious reporting can hardly drop any further.
Again, I have to ask for evidence of your claims. In particular because of the mass graves and tents.
How do you get the certainty that a return of this “respiratory disease” to Germany is impossible? We live in a globalized world. If we don't even know for sure which pathogen it is, how can one make statements about a basic immunization?
1. Hartisland.net
2. There has never been an earthquake that sunk an entire continent, but where do you get the certainty that this is impossible?
How is mortality explained in so many other countries around the world? Where does Merkel have the power to bring all these governments and institutes across the world to support her theory? Why should China and the US ruin their economy just because the government in Germany wants to cover up their failings?
The Chancellor does not have the power to “make all governments in the world equal”. But the Great Depression has that power.
The great power of China had no need to push the corona epidemic forward and was able to stifle the beginning excitement with its means.
In my understanding of the law, without being a lawyer, some statements are legal and violate the personal rights of criticized persons. I cannot imagine that a person can be called an imposter without being judged by the courts. For the fact, one would have to provide striking evidence that should not only lie in antipathy and the inability to objectively argue. It reminds me very much of the unbearable nature of the AfD to disparage its unpleasant people.
A man in a white coat and with medical authority who explains to the public that at least 300 or even 000 million Germans would die from a corona virus has passed very hard. He is responsible for many deaths. It couldn't get any worse. I feel reminded of Germany's past. The virologist group collected 1,5 million euros from Mrs. Karliczek for this service. Are they not mafia structures?
The expression imposter fits because it is only a virologist and has no idea about epidemiology. A fair scientist does not do something that expresses himself about things he has no idea about. But the swine flu fraud has had no consequences.
And as far as the law is concerned, different rules of the game apply to the political arena.